FMA Communications Inc.
2135 Point Blvd.
Elgin, IL 60123
President & CEO,
FMA Communications Inc.:
Group Publisher: Dave Brambert
Editor-in-Chief: Dan Davis,
Senior Editor: Tim Heston,
The Tube & Pipe Journal Editor:
Eric Lundin, email@example.com
STAMPING Journal Editor:
Kate Bachman, firstname.lastname@example.org
Practical Welding Today Editor:
Contributing Editor: Amy Nickel
Associate Editor: Sue Roberts
Senior Copy Editor: Teresa Chartos
Graphic Designers: Mary Mincemoyer,
Janell Drolsum, Margaret Clark,
Publication Coordinator: Kelly Palmer
Director of Circulation: Kim Bottomley
Circulation Manager: Brenda Wilson
Data Verification Specialist:
Senior Fulfillment Specialist:
Web Content Manager: Vicki Bell
Web Designer: Sherry Young
Senior Web Developer: Mike Kunzelman
Senior Account Representatives:
Statement of Policy
As the official publication of the Fabricators & Manufacturers Association, International, The
FABRICATOR recognizes the need and importance of disseminating information about modern
metal forming and fabricating techniques, machinery, tooling and management concepts for
the metal fabricator. The policy of the publisher and this journal is to be nonpartisan, favoring
no one product or company. The representations of fact and opinions expressed in the articles
are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the publisher and this journal.
By including information on new products, new literature, news of the industry, articles, etc.,
this impartiality is strived for and extends to the mention of trade names. Unless product
identification makes the reference unavoidable, the generic name is used. We acknowledge
that on occasion there may be oversights and errors; the editors regret such oversights and
re-emphasize their policy to be impartial at all times. The publisher reserves the right to
refuse advertising deemed inappropriate for publication in The FABRICATOR, including ads
for classes of products and services not considered of significant interest to the readership.
“ The FABRICATOR” is a service mark and a trademark of the Fabricators & Manufacturers
Association, International, and is used, under license, by FMA Communications Inc. Standard
Rate & Data Service lists our advertising rates in Section 88. Consult SRDS or our current rate
card for full rates and data. Publications of FMA Communications Inc. maintain a policy of
keeping editorial and advertising separate to ensure editorial integrity that most benefits our
readership. Editorial content, including feature articles and press releases, is determined solely
by the publisher. Editorial content cannot be purchased, nor can it be used as a benefit of
advertising dollars spent. Editorial is free-of-charge, subject to space availability, and open to
all interested parties that submit items meeting our editorial style and format as determined
by the publisher. Note: Some photographs printed in this publication may be taken with safety
equipment removed for photographic purposes. However, in actual operation, it is recommended that correct safety procedures and equipment be utilized.
14 The FABRICATOR SEPTEMBER 2017
Getting People Into
Editor’s Note: The July 2017 edition of the “Fabricating Update”
e-newsletter included a discussion of Dan Davis’ editorial from
the July 2017 issue of The FABRICATOR. You can read the editorial here: www.thefabricator.com/blog/how-do-you-move-people-to-take-on-manufacturing-jobs-. In the
editorial, Davis said that fabricators can’t wait for
people to relocate from other parts of the U.S. to take
manufacturing jobs that have been open for months.
The following is a portion of the feedback that came
from the metal fabricating community.
I have a different take on the problems associated
with relocating people for manufacturing jobs.
A lot of companies have located themselves in
less-populated areas to avoid unions, to be on better transportation routes, and to get tax breaks.
Manufacturing companies are all looking to hire
younger talent (millennials) to replace their aging
and retiring staff (baby boomers). The problem we
have, as executive recruiters to fabricated metal
manufacturers, is that these millennials do not
want to live and work in rural areas. They all seem
to be attracted to large cities. Companies are going
to have to find better ways to attract younger talent.
Companies have to realize that experienced professionals in their 50s are a great bargain because
they really can’t retire at 62 like past generations
have been able to do. They also are going to stay
at the company far longer than any millennial will.
People who are empty nesters are much more willing to relocate as well. There is actually a lot of age
discrimination out there these days.
I have worked in metal manufacturing for 16 years
as a recruiter, and things have certainly changed
over the years!
Senior Vice President of Recruitment
PointOne Recruiting Solutions
I literally just sent an email to our president, COO,
and vice president of finance and human resources
telling them about the great success we have had
with our part-time program in conjunction with a
local technical college here in the Minneapolis/St.
Paul area. We started a part-time program for students at the technical college and even offered to
pay for most of their tuition if they stayed on full-time after.
Director of Minnesota Operations
CK Worldwide works closely with our local Green
River Community College (GRCC) in Auburn, Wash.
The program director is Scott Schreiber, who was
featured in Practical Welding Today as the 2013 PW-Teacher of the Year.
Our president, Jeff Sharpe, has served on an advisory committee with the school, and they have
often tested some of our new products, providing
valuable feedback as we introduce new tools for TIG
welders. This year Jeff presented to the Washington
Welding Instructors Association meeting held at
GRCC. CK Worldwide offers incentives to vocational
schools through our distributors, and we consulted
with Schreiber at GRCC when we were drafting our
scholarship programs offered through the American
Vice President, Sales and Marketing
How Would You Tackle
This Tank Assembly CAD Model?
As I acquire skills in Solid Works®, I find it easier to
understand your Precision Matters articles with
each passing issue of The FABRICATOR. Thank you
for these excellent and challenging lessons.
In the tank assembly discussion [“Shop technol-
ogy and 3-D CAD: Translating design goals into CAD
I build this parametrically if I had seven different siz-
es to make in one shot and if I wanted to be able to re-
spond to a client’s specific dimensions in minutes?”
So, what would you use as a strategy to do that?
In my thought process, I would design a 3-D wireframe of the assembly and attach that frame in the
assembly, hooking up bits and pieces of drivable
sketch to the wireframe. I could then drive the wireframe from the outside and create all the parts in
one go. It’s a bit touchy because things like Pack &
Go or Save As don’t always do what you want them
to do, and you may not need to make all the parts
each time anyway. You only want drawings of the
customizable parts. I don’t like configurations, either, so that should be out.
I’ve tried my approach in simple assemblies and
found it works reasonably well. However, it was
prone to errors and creates more stuff than I need.
How would you attempt this?
Looking forward to the next article.
Editor’s Note: Here is Gerald Davis’ response: Your e-mail inspired what will appear in the September edition of Precision Matters. If you visit www.thefabricator.
you can download the SolidWorks 2016 CAD files. It
should switch between sizes with a double-click.
I’m afraid that I didn’t come up with an answer that
did not involve configurations, mostly because there
are things that have to be suppressed and unsuppressed in this tank’s product line. Specifically, these
items are forming tools that create the cross break in
Were it not for that, then yes, this could be modeled
with just parametric links. Reference geometry, such as
sketch, plane, and surface, can be used while modeling. Move the geometry, and the model changes shape.
I like Configuration Tables because they focus data
entry into one place. Of course, configurations are not
always a blessing. I don’t like configured assemblies
in manufacturing because they create revision control
nightmares. I go to great lengths to minimize parametric links and configurations for revision management.